On the morning of September 29, the Integrated Tribunal heard a series of disputes between Zhongyou BSS(Qinhuangdao) Petropipe Co., Ltd of BSG Group and Zhenhua Logistics Group Co., Ltd. on maritime cargo transportation contracts. The defendant Zhenhua Logistics Group Co., Ltd. presented two banners "Fair and just; Justice for the people" " A case took three years and justice finally came." to the court and the presiding judge in gratitude for Tianjin Maritime Court of upholding the concept of "Fair and Just; justice for the people", consciously "do not forget the initial heart, remember the mission" of the theme of education, for the healthy development of the logistics industry in Tianjin to provide effective maritime judicial services.

The case was filed by Zhongyou BSS(Qinhuangdao) Petropipe Co., Ltd of BSG Group to sue Zhenhua Logistics Group Co., Ltd. for maritime cargo transportation contract disputes. It took three years and involved more than 20 voyages. The case was complex, and the evidence was numerous. The amount of the subject matter was as high as tens of millions., intertwined with many legal applications and other issues. The judges of Tianjin Maritime Court have the courage to take charge and handle cases impartially and practice the educational achievements of the theme of " Remain true to our original aspiration and keep our mission firmly in mind " with practical actions. They faced difficulties, didn’t evade contradictions, didn’t fear difficulties, and worked overtime many times to find out the facts of cases from piles of cases. Eventually find out the application of the law. The verdict of the first instance was upheld by the High Court. Subsequently, the presiding judge actively facilitated the mediation of more than 10 subsequent cases between the two parties, and eventually the two parties mediated the conclusion of the casse. After the case was closed, the defendant Zhenhua Logistics Group Co., Ltd. was convinced of the results of the court's ruling, and had fulfilled its judgment obligations, and took the legal advice of the presiding judge, corrected the deficiencies in its own business operations, cited warnings, and reduced legal risks.